Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал:
http://ds.knu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/9296Повний запис метаданих
| Поле DC | Значення | Мова |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Semerikov, Serhiy O. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Nechypurenko, Pavlo P. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Vakaliuk, Tetiana A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mintii, Iryna S. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fadieieva, Liliia O. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-12T06:29:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-12T06:29:57Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-01-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Multivariate analysis of Moodle components and grade distribution patterns for adaptive learning environments / Serhiy O. Semerikov, Pavlo P. Nechypurenko, Tetiana A. Vakaliuk, Iryna S. Mintii & Liliia O. Fadieieva // Discover Education. – 2026. – Vol. 5. – Article 15. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01024-1 | uk_UA |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2731-5525 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01024-1 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ds.knu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/9296 | - |
| dc.description | Wang Y, Lai Y, Huang X. Innovations in online learning analytics: A review of recent research and emerging trends. IEEE Access. 2024;12:166761–66775. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3493621. Alnasyan B, Basheri M, Alassafi M. The power of deep learning techniques for predicting student performance in virtual learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers Education: Artif Intell. 2024;6:100231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100231. Hasanov A, Laine TH, Chung TS. A survey of adaptive context-aware learning environments. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ. 2019;11(5):403–28. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-190534. Yu R, Yao T, Bai F. Educational big data analytics for futuristic smart learning using deep learning techniques. Scalable Comput. 2024;25(4):2728–35. https://doi.org/10.12694/scpe.v25i4.2988. Sergeev KA, Mironenko OI, Krivich OY, Petrov AA, Kozlov MV. Using the module analytics and machine learning in LMS moodle at training students of specialty rolling stock. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2023 12;2624(1):050056. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133923 Abuzinadah N, Umer M, Ishaq A, Hejaili AA, Alsubai S, Eshmawi AA, et al. Role of convolutional features and machine learning for predicting student academic performance from MOODLE data. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0293061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293061. Fadieieva L, Semerikov S et al. Exploring the Interplay of Moodle Tools and Student Learning Outcomes: A Composite-Based Structural Equation Modelling Approach. In: Faure E, Tryus Y, Vartiainen T, Danchenko O, Bondarenko M, Bazilo C, editors. Information Technology for Education, Science, and Technics. vol. 222 of Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. pp. 418–435. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71804-5_28 Semerikov SO, Nechypurenko PP, Vakaliuk TA, Mintii IS, Fadieieva LO. Differential effects of moodle course design on student subpopulations: advancing personalized learning in higher education. Smart Learn Environ. 2025;12(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00400-6. Aziz A, Khoukhi F. An Ontological Approach for Service Adaptation in Context Aware Environment. In: Ezziyyani M, editor. Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2019). vol. 1102 of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 91–100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36653-7_9 Ramaswami G, Susnjak T, Mathrani A. Supporting students’ academic performance using explainable machine learning with automated prescriptive analytics. Big Data Cogn Comput. 2022;6(4):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6040105. Moodle. Philosophy. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060901040155/http://docs.moodle.org/en/Philosophy Pascual-Leone J. Piaget as a Pioneer of Dialectical Constructivism: Seeking Dynamic Processes for Human Science. In: Martí E, Rodríguez C, editors. After Piaget. New York: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315082899 Solomon C, Harvey B, Kahn K, Lieberman H, Miller ML, Minsky M, et al. History of logo. Proc ACM Program Lang. 2020;4(HOPL):79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386329. Prawat RS, Mind. Cult Activity. 1999;6(4):255–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524731. Harrer A, Moskaliuk J, Kimmerle J, Cress U. Visualizing wiki-supported knowledge building: co-evolution of individual and collective knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wikis. WikiSym ’08. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2008. p. 19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/1822258.1822284 Ramos E, Ramirez M, Hern’Ndez J, Morales L, Garcia M, Rodriguez J. Toward supporting constructivist instruction through CSCL activities embedded in LMSs. In: Proceedings – 8th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, IE 2012; 2012. pp. 259–266. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/IE.2012.36 Gnadlinger F, Selmanagić A, Simbeck K, Kriglstein S. Adapting Is Difficult! Introducing a Generic Adaptive Learning Framework for Learner Modeling and Task Recommendation Based on Dynamic Bayesian Networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU. INSTICC. SciTePress; 2023. pp. 272–280. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5220/0011964700003470 Jordan C. Comparison of international baccalaureate (IB) chemistry students’ preferred vs actual experience with a constructivist style of learning in a moodle e-learning environment. Int J Lesson Learn Stud. 2013 jun;2(2):155–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251311323397. Liu R, Shi C. Investigating Collaborative Learning Effect in Blended Learning Environment by Utilizing Moodle and WeChat. In: Cheung SKS, Kwok Lf, Shang J, Wang A, Kwan R, editors. Blended Learning: Aligning Theory with Practices. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 3–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41165-1_1 Mirata V, Bergamin P. Developing an implementation framework for adaptive learning: A case study approach. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL. vol. 2019-November; 2019. pp. 668–673. Available from: https://doi.org/10.34190/EEL.19.024 Hilali K, Chergui M, Ammoumou A. Adaptive Learning Systems: A Comprehen- sive Overview and Identification of Challenges. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions, ICTMOD 2023; 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD59086.2023.10438128 Rienties B, Toetenel L, Bryan A. Scaling up learning design: impact of learning design activities on LMS behavior and performance. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. LAK’15. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2015. pp. 315–319. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723600 López-Pernas S, Saqr M. From Variables to States to Trajectories (VaSSTra): A Method for Modelling the Longitudinal Dynamics of Learning and Behaviour. In: García-Pen˜alvo FJ, García-Holgado A, editors. Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023. pp. 1169–1178. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_123 Uwimpuhwe G, Singh A, Higgins S, Coux M, Xiao Z, Shkedy Z, et al. Latent class evaluation in educational trials: what percentage of children benefits from an intervention? J Exp Educ. 2022;90(2):404–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1767021. Van der Velde M, Sense F, Borst JP, Rijn H. Large-scale evaluation of cold-start mitigation in adaptive fact learning: knowing what matters more than knowing who. User Model User-Adapt Interact. 2024;34(4):1467–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-024-09401-5. Lawrence R, Foss S, Urazova T. Evaluation of submission limits and regression penalties to improve student behavior with automatic assessment systems. ACM Trans Comput Educ. 2023;23(3):31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591210. Rienties B, Nguyen Q, Holmes W, Reedy K. (2017) A review of ten years of implementation and research in aligning learning design with learning analytics at the open university UK. Interact Des Archit. 33:134–54. Wang H, Huang T, Zhao Y, Hu S. The impact of dashboard feedback type on learning Effectiveness, focusing on learner differences. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4474. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054474. Muñoz JLR, Ojeda FM, Jurado DLA, Peña PFP, Carranza CPM, Berríos HQ, et al. Systematic review of adaptive learning technology for learning in higher education. Eurasian J Educational Res. 2022;2022(98):221–33. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2022.98.014. Sihabudin Sahid DS, Nugroho LE, Santosa PI. A model of personalized context aware E-learning based on psychological experience. J Telecommunication Electron Comput Eng. 2018;10(1–5):137–43. https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/3645. Salazar OM, Ovalle DA, Duque ND et al. Incorporating Context-Awareness Services in Adaptive U-MAS Learning Environments. In: Bajo J, Hallenborg K, Pawlewski P, Botti V, Sánchez-Pi N, Duque Méndez ND, editors. Highlights of Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Sustainability - The PAAMS Collection. vol. 524 of Communications in Computer and Information Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 331–339. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19033-4_28 Sweller J. CHAPTER TWO - Cognitive Load Theory. In: Mestre JP, Ross BH, editors. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. vol. 55. Academic Press; 2011. pp. 37–76. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8 Zimmerman BJ. Chapter 2 - Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 13–39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7 Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. Br J Educ Psychol. 1976;46(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x. Richardson M, Abraham C, Bond R. Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(2):353–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838. Takase M, Yoshida I. The relationships between the types of learning approaches used by undergraduate nursing students and their academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prof Nurs. 2021;37(5):836–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.06.005. Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University; 2011. Alajlani N, Crabb M, Murray I. A systematic review in Understanding stakeholders’ role in developing adaptive learning systems. J Computers Educ. 2024;11(3):901–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00283-x. Black P, Wiliam D. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan. 2010;92(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1977. Available from: https://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press; 1978. Available from:https://w.pauldowling.me/rtf/2021.1/readings/LSVygotsky_1978_MindinSocietyDevelopmentofHigherPsycholo.pdf Webb NM. Peer interaction and learning in small groups. Int J Educational Res. 1989;13(1):21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Pract. 1999;38(2):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834. Wang Y, Huang X, Yu Q, Lai Y. Emerging Techniques for Online Learning Analytics. In: Cheung SKS, Wang FL, Paoprasert N, Charnsethikul P, Li KC, Phusavat K, editors. Technology in Education. Innovative Practices for the New Normal. vol. 1974 of Communications in Computer and Information Science. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2024. pp. 109–118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8255-4_10 Tepgec¸ M, Ifenthaler D. learning analytics based interventions: a systematic review of experimental studies. In: Sampson DG, Ifenthaler D, Isaías P, editors. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, CELDA 2022. IADIS Press; 2022. pp. 327–330. Available from: https://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/learning-analytics-based-interventions-a-systematic-review-of-experimental-studies Fadieieva L, Semerikov S. KSPU Moodle activities and marks 2020–2022. Zenodo. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10938019 Asriadi AMM, Hadi S, Istiyono E, Retnawati H. Does differentiated instruction affect learning outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Peda- Gogical Res. 2023;7(5):18–33. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202322021. Josephine N, Cedric A, McDaniel ST, Kanagwa B, Joseph T, Marvin G. Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques for Students Grade Prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2024 Sixteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing. IC3-2024. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2024. pp. 213–225. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3675888.3676055 Willis JE, Slade S, Prinsloo P. Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: a typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective. Education Tech Research Dev. 2016;64(5):881–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9463-4. Wang P, Zhao P, Li Y, Design of Education Information Platform on Education Big Data Visualization. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2022;2022:6779105. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6779105. Fernández Alemán JL. Automated assessment in a programming tools course. IEEE Trans Educ. 2011;54(4):576–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2010.2098442. Barna OV, Kuzminska OH, Semerikov SO. Enhancing digital competence through STEM-integrated universal design for learning: a pedagogical framework for computer science education in Ukrainian secondary schools. Discover Educ. 2025;4(1):357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00821-y. | uk_UA |
| dc.description.abstract | The increasing sophistication of Learning Management Systems (LMS) has generated vast amounts of educational data with untapped potential for enhancing teaching and learning. While previous research has examined relationships between LMS components and overall student performance, less attention has been paid to how these components influence specific grade distributions. This study employs multivariate analysis techniques to investigate how Moodle components relate to distinct grade categories (A-F) across 985 courses at a Ukrainian pedagogical university. Using multiple regression models, canonical correlation analysis, and cluster analysis, we identify significant relationships between specific Moodle components and grade outcomes. Information components (particularly teacher presence) strongly predict excellence, while Activity x Communication interactions support satisfactory performance. Resource diversity combined with structured activities correlates with reduced failure rates. We further identify four distinct course design clusters with characteristic grade distribution patterns. The findings demonstrate how learning analytics can move beyond descriptive insights toward prescriptive guidance. This nuanced understanding of grade distribution patterns provides practical guidance for tailoring course design to diverse pedagogical objectives and student needs, thus contributing to the emerging field of personalized digital learning environments. | uk_UA |
| dc.language.iso | en | uk_UA |
| dc.publisher | Springer | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | Learning management systems | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | Moodle | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | Grade distributions | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | Learning analytics | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | Adaptive learning | uk_UA |
| dc.subject | Context-aware learning environments | uk_UA |
| dc.title | Multivariate analysis of Moodle components and grade distribution patterns for adaptive learning environments | uk_UA |
| dc.type | Article | uk_UA |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01024-1 | - |
| local.submitter.email | semerikov@ccjourn... | uk_UA |
| Розташовується у зібраннях: | Кафедра професійної та соціально-гуманітарної освіти | |
Файли цього матеріалу:
| Файл | Опис | Розмір | Формат | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s44217-025-01024-1.pdf | 2.33 MB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/Відкрити |
Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.
